Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: elmagno Date: Dec 10, 2010 10:23am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: GOG: Give it a rest. It's been debated and settled.

No one, especially me, accused any particular person of altering this altered film. So get your own facts straight.

Seen a good copy of this film?

Do you have a theory you'd like to advance as to how the copyright is not in the uploader's copy?

Any real facts appreciated.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Elric_Dewisant Date: Dec 10, 2010 10:31am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: GOG: Give it a rest. It's been debated and settled.

Why should facts get in your way? The concept of rampant copyright fraud in the registries, accepting consensus, and reason certainly haven't.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: elmagno Date: Dec 10, 2010 10:45am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: GOGis Not Pd

So you think Gog is a victim of "rampant copyright fraud in the registries"?

The uploader thinks it's not that at all, but in the film itself. Two very different justifications, I mean theories.

Neither has had a single fact offered in their support.

Generalizations are not facts. Nor is the bandwagon rhetoric of "consensus."



This post was modified by elmagno on 2010-12-10 18:45:16

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)